Second appeal against a decree in a property suit. No appearance for appellants on two consecutive hearing dates; the second appeal was dismissed for default, with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S.A(MD)No.166 of 2013
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 25.04.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR
S.A(MD)No.166 of 2013
1.A.Joseph 2.Laser ...Appellants -VsL.John Felix ... Respondent
PRAYER : Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil
Procedure, to set aside the judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.41 of 2010 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Judge, Thanjavur, dated 29.09.2011 reversing
the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.296 of 2008, on the file of the District Munsif, Thanjavur, dated 27.03.2010.
For Appellants : No appearance For Respondent : Mr.T.Antony Arulraj
1/4
JUDGMENT
S.A(MD)No.166 of 2013
When the second appeal was taken up for hearing on 23.04.2024, there
was no representation for the appellants in the forenoon as well as in the afternoon. Hence, in order to give an opportunity to the appellants, the Registry was directed to list the matter today (i.e.,) 25.04.2024 under the caption 'for dismissal'.
Appeal is dismissed for default. However, there shall be no order as to costs.
25.04.2024 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No cp To
2/4
S.A(MD)No.166 of 2013
Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
3/4
S.A(MD)No.166 of 2013
S.SOUNTHAR, J.
cp
S.A(MD)No.166 of 2013
25.04.2024
4/4
1 provisions across 1 enactments
A.Joseph
Laser
L.John Felix
S.Sounthar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
