Ganapathy v. Anandam
Case brief
What is this about?
Second appeal against concurrent judgments in a title suit was listed for disposal or dismissal after repeated adjournments at the appellant's instance. With no representation for the appellant on the hearing date, the appeal was dismissed for default.
What the court decided
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED :29.04.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR
S.A(MD)NO.152 of 2013
Ganapathy :Appellant/Appellant/Plaintiff
.vs.
1.Anandam
2.Vadivu
3.Babu :Respondents/Respondents Defendants
PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree made in A.S.No.49 of 2011, dated 27.07.2011, on the file of Additional District Judge/Fast Track Court No.II, Thoothukudi, confirming the judgment and decree made in O.S.No.253 of 2008, dated 18.06.2010, on the file of District Munsif, Srivaikundam.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Ganapathy
- respondent
Anandam
- respondent
Vadivu
- respondent
Babu
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court