Surulivel v. Sudha
Case brief
What is this about?
Partition suit where defendants claimed the fourth schedule item as self-acquired or government-assigned to defendant 1. The High Court upheld concurrent findings that the assignment order Ex.B5 could not confer exclusive title and dismissed the second appeal.
What did the court decide?
None granted to appellants; judgment and decree of courts below confirmed with respect to plaintiff's 1/4th share; no costs.
What the court decided
SA(MD)No.144 of 2022
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
Date of Reserved 26/07/2024 Date of Pronounced 18/10/2024
CORAM
The Hon'ble Mr.Justice G.ILANGOVAN
SA(MD)No.144 of 2022 and CMP(MD)No.1658 of 2022
- 1.Surulivel
- 2.Mohan
- 3.Prabu
- 4.Nethaji 5.Siva : Appellants/Appellants/ Defendants 1 to 5
Vs.
- 1.Sudha : 1st Respondent/ 1st Respondent/ Plaintiff 2.Suruliammal 3.Suruliammal @ Pasunkili : 2nd and 3rd Respondents/ 2nd and 3rd Respondents/ 7th and 8th Defendants
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the first appellate court was right in confirming the decree regarding the fourth item said to have been assigned by the Government in favour of the first defendant?
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Surulivel
- appellant
Mohan
- appellant
Prabu
- appellant
Nethaji
- appellant
Siva
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court