Second appeal and cross objection against decrees in a property suit; neither side appeared to prosecute the matters on two consecutive hearings, so both were dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 12.12.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY
S.A(MD)No. 13 of 2012 and CROS.OBJ(MD)No.19 of 2022 and M.P(MD)No. 2 of 2012
Sanjeevinathan
...Appellant
Vs.
...Respondents
[ Respondents 3 to 6 are brought on record as LRs of the deceased 1st respondent vide Order of this Court, dated 26.11.2024 ]
PRAYER : Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the Judgment and Decree dated 29.06.2011 passed in A.S.No.4 of 2001 on the file of the District and Sessions Court, Sivagangai, partly allowing the appeal without cost modifying the Decree and Judgment dated 14.12.2010 rendered by the Learned Subordinate Judge, Sivagangai in O.S.No.5 of 2008 on his file dismissing the suit with Cost.
For Appellant : Non appearance
For Respondents :Mr.A.L. Vijey Devraj
2
CROS.OBJ(MD)No.19 of 2022
[Cross Objector s 3 to 6 are brought on record as LRs of the deceased 1st Cross Objector vide Order of this Court, dated 26.11.2024 ]
Vs.
Sanjeevinathan
...Respondent
PRAYER : Cross Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, to allow the Cross appeal and thereby setting aside the Judgment and Decree in A.S.No.4 of 2001 on the file of the District and Sessions Court, Sivagangai, dated 29.06.2011 as far as the same is against the appellants, partly allowing and modifying the Decree and Judgment passed in O.S.No.5 of 2008, dated 14.12.2010 on the file of the Learned Subordinate Judge, Sivagangai with Cost.
For Cross Objectors : Mr.A.L. Vijey Devraj For Respondents : Non appearance
COMMON JUDGMENT
In the last hearing there was no representation on the side of the
appellants in S.A(MD)No.13 of 2012 and respondents in Cross Objectors in
3
CROS.OBJ(MD)No.19 of 2022. Since they were not represented either by Counsel or by themselves to prosecute these matters, these matters were posted today (i.e. 12.12.2024) under the caption 'for dismissal'. Today also they have not represented by their Counsel and they are not present in person, which shows that they are not interested in prosecuting these matters.
NCC :Yes/No Index :Yes/No 12.12.2024 Internet:Yes/No
KSA
4
To
5
S.SRIMATHY, J
KSA
Common Judgment made in S.A(MD)No.13 of 2012 and CROS.OBJ(MD)No.19 of 2022
12.12.2024
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sanjeevinathan
M. Selvam @ Thiraineethi Selvam
Krishnaveni
Indira
Vasantha
Arunarani
S.Srimathy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
