Subbiah Pandian v. Maruthappan
Case brief
What is this about?
Second appeals filed by appellants were dismissed for default as they failed to appear and provide instructions on the hearing date.
What the court decided
1
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED :01.07.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR
S.A(MD)Nos.1193 and 1194 OF 2008
1.Subbiah Pandian
2.Shanmugaiah :Appellants/Respondents/ Defendants in both appeals. .vs.
1.Maruthappan 2.Thangammal :Respondents/Appellants/ Plaintiffs in both appeals.
PRAYER IN S.A(MD)NO.1193 OF 2008 Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree made in A.S.No.35 of 2007, dated 29.04.2008, on the file of Sub-Court, Ambasamudram modifying the judgment and decree made in O.S.No.478 of 2004, dated 7.12.2006, on the file of Principal District Munsif Court, Ambasamudram.
PRAYER IN S.A(MD)NO.1194 OF 2008 Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree made in A.S.No.41 of 2007, dated 29.04.2008, on the file of Sub-Court, Ambasamudram modifying the judgment and decree made in O.S.No.478 of 2004, dated 7.12.2006, on the file of Principal District Munsif Court, Ambasamudram.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Subbiah Pandian
- appellant
Shanmugaiah
- respondent
Maruthappan
- respondent
Thangammal
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court