Dismissed
Thuluva Vellalar Sangam v. Kancheepuram Municipality
Madras HCSA/995/2012
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S.A.No.995 of 2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 28.10.2024
Coram:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR
S.A.No.995 of 2012 and
M.P.No.1 of 2012
Thuluva Vellalar Sangam, Present: Tmt.A.Balkis, B.L., Macheswarar Sorpozhivu Thirumana Mandabam Rep by it Secretary Dr.Radhakrishnan. ... Appellant / Plaintiff
Vs.
Kancheepuram Municipality Rep by its Municipal Commissioner, Nellukara Street, Big Kancheepuram. ... Respondent / Defendant
Prayer : This Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure praying against the Judgment and Decree in A.S.No.47 of 2011 dated 10.04.2012 by the learned Sub Court, Kancheepuram reversing the Judgment and decree rendered in O.S.No.346 of 2000 dated 05.04.2010 on the file of the learned Additional District Munsif, Kancheepuram.
Page No.1 of 6
S.A.No.995 of 2012
For Appellant : Mr.R.Singaravelan For Respondent : No Appearance
J U D G M E N T
The learned counsel for the appellant would contend that he has written a letter to the appellant on 25.09.2024 intimating to contact him, as the case was listed for final hearing.
has not reported any instructions to the counsel on record.
proceed further.
Page No.2 of 6
S.A.No.995 of 2012
on record has taken all steps and further submits that when all the efforts taken by him to contact the appellant either on phone or even addressing through registered post, the attitude of the appellant in not giving any instructions to proceed further and it is becoming burden on the counsel, whether to proceed further or not? Further they should not be blamed before the Bar council for non prosecuting the case and requested the above said letter be scanned as part and parcel of the order. The said submission is also recorded.
Page No.3 of 6
S.A.No.995 of 2012
prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
28.10.2024
Index : Yes Speaking Order : Yes Neutral Citation : Yes jas
Page No.4 of 6
S.A.No.995 of 2012
To
Page No.5 of 6
S.A.No.995 of 2012
N.SENTHILKUMAR, J.
jas
S.A.No.995 of 2012 and M.P.No.1 of 2012
28.10.2024
Page No.6 of 6
Thuluva Vellalar Sangam
Kancheepuram Municipality
N.Senthilkumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court