M.Liyakath Ali v. Mumtaj Begam
Case brief
What is this about?
The learned counsel for the appellant requested and was granted permission to withdraw the Second Appeal. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn and no costs were awarded.
What did the court decide?
Permission to withdraw the appeal granted; appeal dismissed as withdrawn; no costs awarded.
What the court decided
S.A.No.849 of 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 02.01.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN
S.A.No.849 of 2013 and
M.P.No.1 of 2013
M.Liyakath Ali
...Appellant
Vs.
Mumtaj Begam ...Respondent
PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the Judgment and Decree dated 18.02.2013 in A.S.No.4 of 2012 on the file of the Sub Court, Pollachi, confirming the Judgment and Decree dated 01.08.2011 in O.S.No.271 of 2005 on the file of the learned District Munsif, Pollachi.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M.Liyakath Ali
- respondent
Mumtaj Begam
Coram
V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court