Vasantha v. Latha
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Madras, in a non-speaking order, stated that the appellant had died. It recorded that the appeal had abated and dismissed the second appeal filed under Section 100 of the CPC, closing the connected miscellaneous petition.
What did the court decide?
Disposed of the second appeal due to abatement caused by the death of the appellant.
What the court decided
S.A.No.680 of 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 01.03.2024
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN
S.A.No.680 of 2013 and
M.P.No.1 of 2013
Vasantha W/o.Pichai Pillai .. Appellant
vs.
Latha W/o.Ravichandran
..Respondent
Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of CPC against the judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.33 of 2012 dated 25.03.2013 on the file of the Court of Principal Subordinate Court, Mayiladuthurai in confirming the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.199 of 2011 dated 12.03.2012 on the file of the Court of Principal District Munsif, Mayiladuthurai.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the second appeal should be dismissed as having abated due to the death of the appellant.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Vasantha W/o.Pichai Pillai
- respondent
Latha W/o.Ravichandran
Coram
V.Lakshminarayan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court