objections on the side of 1st defendant is that the plaintiff not produced the remittance proof for making payment towards purchase of share. But, before the trial court, the plaintiff produced Ex.A1, through which he is able to establish that at the earliest point of time, the address of plaintiff was erroneously given and subsequently, the same was rectified. Thereafter, the dividend warrants were issued during the year 2008-2014 and the same were marked as Ex.A1 to Ex.A6. Therefore, the suit was filed in the year of 2015. The receipt letters issued between the 1st defendant and the 2nd defendant also produced. It is to be noted that there is no evidence on the side of appellant nor any documentary evidence, however the 1st defendant have contested the suit. The plaintiff proved that he has purchased the share certificates and also received the dividends. Therefore, the objection raised on the side of 1st defendant was rightly declined by the courts below, which needs no interference. Hence, I do not find any merit in this Second Appeal as there is no substantial question of law involved. Accordingly, this Second Appeal is dismissed. Time is granted to the appellant/1st defendant to hand over 12 share certificates under Folio No. 31457 for the period of two months from the