Second appeal dismissed as abated after counsel reported that steps had not been taken and the appellant's client had not contacted; connected miscellaneous petition closed, no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S.A.No.656 of 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 02.02.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN
S.A.No.656 of 2013 and
M.P.No.1 of 2013
Chinna Chenna Naicker
... Appellant
Vs.
1.Selvi
2.Periya Chenna Naicker
3.Chinnammal
6.Kuppusamy @ Mahendran
7.Thilagavathy ... Respondents
Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the Judgment and decree dated 26.11.2010 made in A.S.No.144 of 2009 on the file of the Principal District Court, Erode
Page No 1 of 3
S.A.No.656 of 2013
reversal of the judgment and decree dated 19.07.2007 made in O.S.No.39 of 2005 on the file of the Sub Court, Bhavani.
For Appellant : Mr.N.Manokaran
For Respondents R1, R5 to R7 : Served – No Appearance R2 to R4 : Notice returned – No appearance
JUDGMENT
The learned counsel for the appellant represents that steps have not been taken and their client have not contacted. Therefore, this appeal may be dismissed as abated.
02.02.2024
Index : Yes/No Speaking Order : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No dpa
To:
Page No 2 of 3
S.A.No.656 of 2013
V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J.
dpa
S.A.No656 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013
02.02.2024
Page No 3 of 3
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Chinna Chenna Naicker
Selvi
Periya Chenna Naicker
Chinnammal
Bommiammal W/o. Palanisamy
Bommiammal W/o. Late Marasamy
V. Lakshminarayanan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
