Jayalakshmi v. Sankari
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed a second appeal filed under Section 100 CPC for default due to the absence of appearance by the appellant and failure to return service notice.
What did the court decide?
Second Appeal dismissed for default. Connected Civil Miscellaneous Petition closed.
What the court decided
S.A.No. 625 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 26.02.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA
S.A.No. 625 of 2021 & C.M.P. No. 12953 of 2021
Jayalakshmi
...Appellant
Vs.
1.Sankari
2.The Commissioner, Corporation of Chennai, Rippon Building, Chennai.
3.The Zonal Officer, Zone No.9, Corporation of Chennai, Saidapet, Chennai – 600 015.
4.The Assistant Engineer, Corporation Division No.141, Five Furlong Road, Guindy, Chennai – 600 032. ...Respondents
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Jayalakshmi
- respondent
Sankari
- respondent
The Commissioner, Corporation of Chennai
- respondent
The Zonal Officer, Zone No.9, Corporation of Chennai
- respondent
The Assistant Engineer, Corporation Division No.141
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court