Second appeal by defendants against reversal in first appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution, as appellants made no representation over several hearings despite being listed. The first appellate court's findings were confirmed and the connected miscellaneous petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S.A.No.532 of 2010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 12.08.2024
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI
S.A.No.532 of 2010 and M.P.No.1 of 2010
.. Appellants
Vs.
1.Krishnammal 2.Thangaraj
.. Respondents
PRAYER : Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, prayed to set aside the Judgment and Decree dated 12.10.2009 passed in Appeal Suit No.113 of 2008, on the file of the Subordinate Court, Rasipuram, Namakkal District, reversing the judgment and decree dated 24.01.2006 made in O.S.No.92 of 2005 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Rasipuram, Namakkal District.
S.A.No.532 of 2010
For Appellants : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.D.Siva Kumaran
J U D G M E N T
The appellants have filed this Second Appeal to set aside the Judgment and Decree dated 12.10.2009 passed in Appeal Suit No.113 of 2008, on the file of the Subordinate Court, Rasipuram, Namakkal District, reversing the judgment and decree dated 24.01.2006 made in O.S.No.92 of 2005 on the file
of the District Munsif Court, Rasipuram, Namakkal District.
S.A.No.532 of 2010
12.08.2024
rri Index : Yes/No Speaking Order: Yes/No Nutral citation: Yes/No
To
S.A.No.532 of 2010
T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.
rri
S.A.No.532 of 2010 and M.P.No.1 of 2010
12.08.2024
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the second appeal against the first appellate court's reversal should be dismissed for non-prosecution due to repeated absence of appellants' counsel.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Ajit Kumar Singh and others vs. Chiranjibi Lal and othersFollowed¶4
2002(3) SCC 609 · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sengodan
Nagarajan
Rangasamy
Madeshwaran
Thiyagarajan
Angamuthu
T.V. Thamilselvi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
