Packiaraj v. Shajakhan
Case brief
What is this about?
Second appeal filed under Section 100 CPC was dismissed for default as neither party appeared in court despite listing for dismissal.
What the court decided
S.A.No.329 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 18.04.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE RMT.TEEKAA RAMAN
S.A. No. 329 of 2022 and C.M.P.No.6849 of 2022
1.Packiaraj
2.Sathiyaraj (Major)
[2nd appellant declared as major and mother Poongavanam discharged from his guardianship vide court order dt.01.04.2022 made in C.M.P.No. 5650 of 2022 in S.A.SR.No.47945 of 2021] ... Appellants
-Vs-
1.Shajakhan 2.Kasim
... Respondents
Prayer : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code against the judgment and decree made in A.S.No.99 of 2006 dated 26.02.2021 on the file of the learned Additional Sub Judge, Kallakurichi, reversing the judgment and decree in O.S.No.908 of 1998 dated 07.10.2005 on the file of the learned Principal District Munsif, Kallakurichi.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Packiaraj
- appellant
Sathiyaraj (Major)
- respondent
Shajakhan
- respondent
Kasim
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · Rmt. Teekaa Raman
- Order 2 · K. Govindarajan Thilakavadi
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court