Sudhakar v. Thangaprakasan
Case brief
What is this about?
Second Appeals filed under Section 100 of CPC were dismissed as withdrawn by the High Court of Madras after counsel reported an amicable settlement between the parties.
What the court decided
S.A.Nos.254 & 255 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated: 28.02.2024
Coram:
THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE P.B.BALAJI
S.A.Nos.254 & 255 of 2018 & C.M.P.No.6502 of 2018
S.A.No.254 of 2018
- Minor. Sudhakar,
- Son of Thangaprakasam.
- Minor Srinath,
Son of Thangaprakasam. (1 & 2 Appellants represented by Next Friend/Mother, Nithiyakalyani)
... Appellants
1st and 2nd Appellants declared as major and her mother/next friend Nithiyakalyani discharged from the guardianship vide order of this Court dated 14.02.2018 made in C.M.P.No.21804 and 2514 of 2017 in S.A.Sr.No.62391 of 2017. (PSNJ)
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Second Appeals can be allowed to be withdrawn after filing.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Sudhakar
- appellant
Srinath
- respondent
Thangaprakasam
- respondent
Perumal
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court