T.Muthu (Died) v. Arulandu (Died)
Case brief
What is this about?
Second Appeal dismissed for default as appellants failed to appear and provide representation on the date of hearing. No order as to costs.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed for default. No order as to costs.
What the court decided
S.A.No.1739 of 2002
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 15.07.2024
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR
S.A.No.1739 of 2002
1.T.Muthu (Died)
2.P.Karuppan
3.Arumugam (Died)
4.Murugesan ... Defendants 2 to 5/Appellants Appellants
(Memo presented before the Court on 28.04.2022 is recorded as Appellants 1 & 3 and R-2 died and there is no need to implead their LRs, since they are in representative capacity vide Court order, dated 28.04.2022 made in S.A.No. 1739 of 2002.
Vs.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
T.Muthu
- appellant
P.Karuppan
- appellant
Arumugam
- appellant
Murugesan
- respondent
Arulandu
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court