" 9. The Courts below also found that the plaintiff is in possession of the property be leasing it out. The lower appellate Court, after appreciating the evidence, correctly found that all the suit properties are absolute properties of Sadakula Telungar Naickers who are living in 14 villages mentioned in the plaint. On the other hand, the lower appellate Court has not granted the decree as prayed for by the plaintiff/Sangam. The lower appellate Court has not declared that the suit property belongs to the plaintiff/Sangam. So, the plaintiff/Sangam or its members, cannot claim any exclusive right or title to the suit property as the decree passed by the lower appellate Court has become final insofar as the plaintiff/Sangam is concerned. But only, "Sadakula Telungar Naickers" residing in the said 14 villages, are entitled to the said suit properties even if they are members of the plaintiff/Sangam or defendants/Sangams. When such a decree has been passed, I am not able to understand as to how the defendants are aggrieved by the said decree. If the defendants also come within the said qualification, they are also entitled to get the benefit of the decree granted by the lower appellate Court. Even with respect to the decree regarding injunction as decreed by the Courts below, the same cannot operate against the persons who belong to Sadakula Telungu Naickers and residing in any one of the 14 villages as their rights in the suit properties had been approved and declared.
