Ramachandran v. Elumalai
Case brief
What is this about?
In this second appeal, the appellant filed a memo stating the primary appellant died and no instructions were available. The Single Judge dismissed the appeal as abated due to the death of the addressee without any representative.
What did the court decide?
Dismissed as abated due to death of addressee and lack of instructions from appellants.
What the court decided
S.A. No. 1664 of 2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 22.11.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA
S.A. No. 1664 of 2011 and M.P. No. 1 of 2012
1.Ramachandran
2.Kandasamy 3.Govindaraj ...Appellants
Vs.
1.Elumalai
- 2.Ammasi
- 3.Babu
- 4.Dhandapani
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the second appeal can be maintained when the addressee is reported dead and no instructions are received from any appellant.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Ramachandran
- appellant
Kandasamy
- appellant
Govindaraj
- respondent
Elumalai
- respondent
Ammasi
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court