Second Appeal dismissed for non-prosecution as the appellants had no representation on multiple hearing dates and the matter was listed under the caption 'For Dismissal'. No substantive issue was decided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S.A.No.1623 of 2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 01.10.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR
S.A.No.1623 of 2011
...Defendants / Respondents / Appellants
-Vs-
1.Thiru.Govindaraja Mudaliar (Died)
...Plaintiffs / Appellants Respondents
Prayer:- Second Appeal preferred under Section 100 of CPC, against the judgment and decree dated 15.03.2011 in A.S.No.5 of 2010 on the file of the learned Sub Judge, Poonamalle, which was reversing the judgment and decree in O.S.No.375 of 1997 dated 30.09.2009 on the file of the learned Principal District Munsif, Poonamallee.
For Appellants : No appearance
S.A.No.1623 of 2011
For Respondents : No appearance
J U D G M E N T
When the case was taken up for hearing on 30.01.2024 and 06.09.2024 and 12.09.2024, there was no representation for the appellants. Hence this Court directed the Registry to list the matter under the caption “For Dismissal” on 01.10.2024 [today].
with no other option except to dismiss the appeal for non-prosecution.
In the result, the Second Appeal stands dismissed for NonProsecution . No costs.
01.10.2024
cda Index : Yes/No Speaking/Non Speaking order
S.A.No.1623 of 2011
To
N.SENTHILKUMAR, J.
cda
S.A.No.1623 of 2011
S.A.No.1623 of 2011
01.10.2024
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Nagappa Mudaliar
Panneer Selvam
Vadivelu
Kalaivani
Parvathy
Thiru.Govindaraja Mudaliar
N.Senthilkumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
