Second appeal against concurrent decrees in a property suit was called repeatedly with no representation for the appellant; the High Court dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution and closed connected miscellaneous petitions, with no costs.
None; appeal dismissed for non-prosecution, connected miscellaneous petitions closed, no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S.A.No.1480 of 2010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 18.07.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.SIVAGNANAM
S.A.No.1480 of 2010
K. Kamalam ...Appellant
Vs.
Thamizhselvi ...Respondent
PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C. against the judgment and decree of the learned Principal District Judge, Cuddalore dated 31.01.2008 passed in A.S.No.15 of 2007 dismissing the appeal, confirming the judgment and decree of the learned Subordinate Judge of Panruti in O.S.No.16 of 2002 dated 05.04.2005.
For Appellant : No appearance
For Respondents : No Appearance
J U D G M E N T
S.A.No.1480 of 2010
Second Appeal has been filed against the judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.15 of 2007, dated 31.01.2008, on the file of the Principal District Court, Cuddalore, in confirming the judgment and decree passed in O.S. No.16 of 2002, dated 05.04.2005, on the file of the Sub Court, Panruti.
3. Today also, when the matter is called, there is no representation
S.A.No.1480 of 2010
on behalf of the appellant. Hence, this Second Appeal is dismissed for 'non prosecution'. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions, if any, are also closed.
18.07.2024
mrp Internet:Yes Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non speaking order NCC: Yes/No To
1.The Principal District Court, Cuddalore.
2.The Sub-Court, Panruti.
S.A.No.1480 of 2010
V.SIVAGNANAM, J.
mrp
S.A.No.1480 of 2010
18.07.2024
1 provisions across 1 enactments
K. Kamalam
Thamizhselvi
V. Sivagnanam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
