Dismissed
Settu v. Thangavelu
Madras HCSA/1324/2008
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Suit for permanent and mandatory injunction dismissed by trial court and first appellate court. Sole appellant died during pendency of the second appeal; no steps were taken to bring his legal heirs on record, so the appeal was dismissed as abated.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
S.A. No. 1324 of 2008
¶2
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
¶3
DATED : 09.09.2024
¶4
CORAM
¶5
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI
¶6
S.A. No.1324 of 2008 and M.P.No. 1 of 2008
¶7
Settu .. Appellant
¶8
Versus
¶9
1 Thangavelu
¶10
2 Murugesan
¶11
3 Duraisami
¶12
4 Govindammal
¶13
5 Appavoo (exparte)
¶14
6 Chinnathambi (exparte) .. Respondentss
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Settu
- respondent
Thangavelu
- respondent
Murugesan
- respondent
Duraisami
- respondent
Govindammal
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court