The High Court dismissed the second appeal as infructuous because the suit property had been delivered pursuant to execution proceedings in the underlying suit.
The Second Appeal is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S.A.No. 1279 of 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 17.12.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE R.N.MANJULA
S.A. No.1279 of 2013 and M.P.No.1 of 2013
M.Narayanaswamy (Died) 1. N.Karpagavalli 2. N.Karunamurthy 3. N.Yuvaraj
Vs.
P.Rajasekaran ... Respondent
Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code, 1908, against the judgment and decree of dismissal passed in Appeal Suit in A.S.No.40 of 2005, dated 05.03.2009 by the Subordinate Judge, Ponneri thereby confirming the judgment and decree of dismissal passed in O.s.No.185 of 1997, dated 19.03.2004 by the learned District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruvottiyur.
For Appellants : Mr.R.Munuswamy For Respondent : Mr.B.Ravi
1/4
S.A.No. 1279 of 2013
JUDGMENT
It appears from the representation of both side counsels that the suit property itself has been delivered in pursuant to the Execution proceedings initiated in E.P.No.80 of 2011 in O.S.No.1033 of 1997 on the file of the District Munsif, Thiruvottiyur, and the matter has attained finality.
18.12.2024
Index:Yes/No Speaking Order / Non-speaking order Neutral Citation Case : Yes / No bkn
2/4
S.A.No. 1279 of 2013
To:
3/4
S.A.No. 1279 of 2013
R.N.MANJULA, J.
bkn
S.A. No.1279 of 2013
17.12.2024
4/4
1 provisions across 1 enactments
N.Karpagavalli
P.Rajasekaran
R.N.MANJULA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
