This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
S.A. No. 1104 of 2004
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 02.12.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE T.V.THAMILSELVI
S.A. No.1104 of 2004
... Appellants
Versus
1/4
S.A. No. 1104 of 2004
... Respondents
Prayer:- S econd Appeal has been filed under Section 100 C.P.C., against the judgment and decree dated 14.05.2001 made in A.S.No. 40 of 1999 on the file of the District Judge and the appellate authority of The Nilgiris at Udagamandalam, partly reversing the judgment and decree dated 28.07.1999 made in O.S.No.8 of 1987 on the file of Subordinate Judge, Udagamandalam.
| For Appellant | : No appearance |
|---|---|
| For Respondents | : Mr.M.L.Ganesh for R1 to R11 |
| Mr. S.K.Raghunathan for R14 | |
| R12 – died | |
| R13 – no such person |
JUDGEMENT
When the above Second Appeal was listed on various occasions,
there was no representation on the side of appellants. Hence, the above matter was posted today under the caption “for dismissal”. Even today,
2/4
S.A. No. 1104 of 2004
(02.12.2024) there is no representation on behalf of the appellants either
in person or through their counsel on record. Hence, the above Second
Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.
02.12.2024
rpp
To
District Judge, Nilgiris at Udagamandalam.
3/4
S.A. No. 1104 of 2004
T.V.THAMILSELVI, J.
rpp
S.A. No. 1104 of 2004
02.12.2024
4/4
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the second appeal should be dismissed for non-prosecution due to repeated absence of appellants.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
N.R.Narmada
N.R. Gangadar
D.Rani Ramanan
Maniammal
M.Mani
R.Babu
T.V. Thamilselvi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
