Damodaran v. K.Mohan
Case brief
What is this about?
Suit for bare injunction over suit schedule properties was decreed by the trial court and confirmed in first appeal based on settlement deed and revenue records. The High Court held no question of law arose under Section 100 CPC and dismissed the second appeal.
What the court decided
S.A.No.107 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATUE AT MADRAS
DATED: 05.06.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE
S.A.No.107 of 2021
Damodaran
.. Appellant
Vs
1.K.Mohan 2.K.Jaganathan .. Respondents
Prayer: This Appeal is filed under Section 100 CPC against the judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.14 of 2019 (A.S.No.13 of 2017), dated 14.10.2020, by the Special Sub Court for LAOP Cases, Arakkonam, Vellore District, confirming the judgment decree passed in O.S.No.183 of 2010, dated 14.02.2017, by the District Munsif Court, Arakkonam.
For Appellant : Mr.Jeremiah Gregory John
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the second appeal raised a substantial question of law warranting interference with the concurrent findings that the plaintiffs were in legal possession of the suit properties.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Damodaran
- respondent
K.Mohan
- respondent
K.Jaganathan
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court