Electricity Board pensioners sought review of a 2006 Division Bench judgment on writ appeals concerning adoption of a Government Order left to the Board's discretion. The Court held re-adjudication of decided issues is impermissible in review and found no error apparent on record.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Rev.Appl.Nos.89, 90 & 91 of 2006
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 16.07.2024
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN
Rev.Appl.Nos.89, 90 & 91 of 2006
Thoothukudi District Electricity Board, Pensioners Association (Regd.No.51/98), Represented by its General Secretary A.Subramanian (Pottu).
... Applicant in Rev.Appl.No.90 of 2006
Page No.1 of 7
Rev.Appl.Nos.89, 90 & 91 of 2006
Page No.2 of 7
Rev.Appl.Nos.89, 90 & 91 of 2006
Page No.3 of 7
Rev.Appl.Nos.89, 90 & 91 of 2006
Page No.4 of 7
Rev.Appl.Nos.89, 90 & 91 of 2006
Common Prayer: Review Applications filed under Order 47 Rule 1 r/w Section 114 of Civil Procedure Code, to review the order made in a batch of writ appeals in W.A.Nos.2700, 2703 & 2704 of 2004 dated 07.02.2006 respectively.
C O M M O N O R D E R
(Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM,J. )
The Division Bench of this Court elaborately considered the issues
raised in the writ appeal and delivered Judgement on 07.02.2006.
discretion of the Tamil Nadu Electricity Board. Board being an independent entity well within its power shall take decision on administrative matters.
the present review applications to readjudicate the said issues are
Page No.5 of 7
Rev.Appl.Nos.89, 90 & 91 of 2006
impermissible. We could not able to trace out any error apparent on record
warranting interference. Thus, all the Review Applications stand dismissed .
[S.M.S., J.] [C.K., J.]
16.07.2024
Index : Yes/No Speaking Order : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No veda
To
Page No.6 of 7
Rev.Appl.Nos.89, 90 & 91 of 2006
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. AND C.KUMARAPPAN, J.
veda
Rev.Appl.Nos.89, 90 & 91of 2006
16.07.2024
Page No.7 of 7
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the order in W.A.Nos.2700, 2703 & 2704 of 2004 contains any error apparent on record warranting review.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
C.V.Raghavan
V.Krisnamurthy
M.s.Sugavanam
C.R.Narayana Kurup
P.Krisnasamy
Thoothukudi District Electricity Board, Pensioners Association (Regd.No.51/98), Represented by its General Secretary A.Subramanian (Pottu)
S.M.Subramaniam
C.Kumarappan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
