A review application was filed against a writ appeal judgment. The court noted that liberty was already granted to approach the civil court for damages. The court found no error apparent on the record and dismissed the review application.
Review Application dismissed. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Review Application No.129 of 2010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 12.07.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
AND
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN
Review Application No.129 of 2010 against
W.A.No.1538 of 2007
M/s. Chennai Digital Print Advertising (P) Ltd., Represented by its Managing Director K.Neelamurali, (Previously Known as Saravana Agencies), No.43/1, Paddy Field Road, Perambur, Chennai – 600 011.
... Applicant
Vs.
Fort St. George, Chennai.
Chennai – 600 002.
Chennai – 3.
... Respondents
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page 1 of 4
Review Application No.129 of 2010
Prayer: Review Application filed under Order XLVII Rule 1 read with Section 114 of Civil Procedure Code, to allow the review application and the restore the writ appeal on file of the Court and hear them on merits.
For Applicant : M/s.B.S.G.Firm For R1 : Mr.D.Gopal Government Advocate For R3 : Ms.Aswini Devi Standing Counsel [For GCC]
O R D E R
[Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. ]
This Court has granted liberty to the writ appellant to work out their remedy against the 2nd respondent before the Competent Civil Court for damages by producing necessary evidence, which cannot be done in the writ proceedings.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page 2 of 4
Review Application No.129 of 2010
[S.M.S., J.] [C.K., J.] 12.07.2024
Jeni Index : Yes Neutral Citation : Yes Speaking order / Non-speaking order
To
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page 3 of 4
Review Application No.129 of 2010
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. and C.KUMARAPPAN, J.
Jeni
Review Application No.129 of 2010
12.07.2024
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page 4 of 4
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant established an error apparent on record warranting interference with the previous judgment.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
M/s. Chennai Digital Print Advertising (P) Ltd.
State of Tamil Nadu
Managing Director, Metropolitan Transport Corporation (Chennai) Ltd.
The Commissioner, Corporation of Chennai
S.M.SUBRAMANIAM
C.KUMARAPPAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
