Dismissed

The Divisional Manager v. Mani. C

Madras HC30 Aug 2024REV.APLW(MD)/82/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this review application concerning a medical reimbursement claim allowed in a writ petition, the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court found no error apparent on record. The Court declined to re-examine the ground regarding the hospital not being a network hospital, as merits had already been passed upon, and dismissed the review.

What did the court decide?

Review application dismissed; no orders on costs.

The Divisional Manager Vs Mani. C — Service and Employment | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

Review Application (MD) No.82 of 2024

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 30.08.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND

¶6

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN

¶7

Review Application (MD) No.82 of 2024 against

¶8

W.P.(MD).No.25304 of 2018

¶9

The Divisional Manager, United India Insurance Company Ltd., Divisional Office VI, P.L.A. Rathina Towers, 5^th Floor, Annasalai, Chennai – 600 006. ... Applicant

¶10

Vs.

¶11

1.C.Mani

¶12

2.Principal Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu, Department of Finance (Pension), Secretariat, Chennai.

¶13

3.Director, Health and Rural Service, Chennai.

¶14

4.Director of Treasuries and Accounts, Panagal Building, 2^nd Floor, Saidapet, Chennai – 15.

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page 1 of 5

¶16

Review Application (MD) No.82 of 2024

¶17

5.The Principal District Judge, Pudukottai.

¶18

6.The District Collector, Pudukkottai District.

¶19

7.The Treasury Officer, District Treasury Office, Pudukkottai.

¶20

... Respondents

¶21

Prayer: Review Application filed under Order XLVII, Rule 1 read with Section 114 of Civil Procedure Code, against the order passed by this Court in W.P.(MD).No25304 of 2018 dated 05.12.2023 and allow the above review petition.

¶22

For Applicant : Mr.A.Shajahan

¶23

O R D E R

¶24

[Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. ]

¶25

The review application has been instituted to review the order dated

¶26

05.12.2023 passed in W.P.(MD).No.25304 of 2018

¶27

The medical reimbursement claim of the respondent in the review

¶28

petition was allowed by us.

¶29

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page 2 of 5

¶30

Review Application (MD) No.82 of 2024

¶31

We have considered the merits involved and after hearing the

¶32

parties, passed orders on merits, even after considering the fact that the hospital in which the respondent took treatment was not included in the list of network hospitals. The said ground is again taken in the review application, which need not be entertained.

¶33

Since we find no error apparent on record, the Review Application

¶34

stands dismissed. No costs.

¶35

[S.M.S., J.] [V.L.N., J.] 30.08.2024

¶36

Jeni

¶37

Index : Yes Neutral Citation : Yes Speaking order / Non-speaking order

¶38

¶39

1.The Principal Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu, Department of Finance (Pension), Secretariat, Chennai.

¶40

2.The Director, Health and Rural Service, Chennai.

¶41

3.The Director of Treasuries and Accounts, Panagal Building, 2^nd Floor, Saidapet, Chennai – 15.

¶42

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page 3 of 5

¶43

Review Application (MD) No.82 of 2024

¶44

4.The Principal District Judge, Pudukottai.

¶45

5.The District Collector, Pudukkottai District.

¶46

6.The Treasury Officer, District Treasury Office, Pudukkottai.

¶47

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page 4 of 5

¶48

Review Application (MD) No.82 of 2024

¶49

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J. and V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J.

¶50

Jeni

¶51

Review Application (MD) No.82 of 2024

¶52

30.08.2024

¶53

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Page 5 of 5

The Divisional Manager v. Mani. C

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

The Divisional Manager v. Mani. C

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Elephant G.Rajendran Vs The Commissioner

M.Muthuraman Vs Beevi Nurrani.K.S

Ratchana Rasi Vs Bank of Baroda

P.Karuppanan Vs Chief Educational Officer

Mr.G.Elangovan Vs the Commissioner

Mrs.Sundari Vs the District Collector