Yogambal.N v. Valarmathy
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner sought permission to withdraw the review application. The court allowed the withdrawal and closed the matter without costs.
What the court decided
Rev.Aplw.(MD).No.6 of 2024
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 25.04.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANAND VENKATESH
Review Application Writ (MD).No.6 of 2024 (Through Video Conferencing)
N.Yogambal
.. Petitioner
Vs.
1.Valarmathy
- 2.The Executive Engineer,
(Operation and Maintenance), TANGEDCO, East Trichy,
Trichy District.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the review application?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
N.Yogambal
- respondent
Valarmathy
- respondent
The Executive Engineer, (Operation and Maintenance), TANGEDCO, East Trichy, Trichy District
- respondent
The Assistant Executive Engineer, (Operations and Maintenance), TANGEDCO, Thiruverumbur, Trichy District
- respondent
The Junior Engineer, (Operation and Maintenance), TANGEDCO, Ariyamangalam, Trichy District
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court