Review of an order directing the authorities to issue an ST (Hindu Kattunayakkan) community certificate to the respondent was dismissed: none of the grounds showed any error apparent on the face of the record under Order 47 CPC.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Review Aplc. (MD)No.202 of 2023
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
Dated : 07.03.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN
AND
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI
Review Aplc.(MD) No.202 of 2023 and
W.M.P.(MD)No.19644 of 2023
1.The District Collector, Office of the District Collectorate, Karur District.
2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Karur District, Karur.
...Petitioners
Vs.
R.Shreya ...Respondent
Prayer: Review Petition filed under Order XLVII Rule 1 & 2 r/w. Sec.114 of C.P.C., seeking to review the order passed in W.P.(MD).No.4642 of 2022 dated 21.06.2023.
For Petitioners : Mr.A.K.Manickam
Special Government Pleader
1/4
Review Aplc. (MD)No.202 of 2023
O R D E R
(Order of the Court was made by R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.)
Review of the orders made in W.P.(MD)No.4642 of 2022 dated 21.06.2023 is sought for. The claim of the respondent herein, seeking a community certificate to the effect that she belongs to ST, (Hindu Kattunayakkan) was rejected by the Revenue Divisional Officer, Karur on
the ground that there is no one belonging to Hindu Kattunayakkan Community in Karur Taluk. This is apparently a wrong statement in as much as the census of Tiruchirapalli District shows that Hindu Kattunayakan community were found in Kulithalai Taluk of Karur District. Moreover, the application of the respondent for grant of such certificate was accompanied by the certificate granted to her paternal uncle, Mr.Kannadasan, which was verified by the State Level Scrutiny Committee No.III and affirmed on 16.10.2019. The certificate to Mr.Kannadasan was also granted by the Tahsildhar of Kulithalai Taluk at Karur District.
2.Reliance is also placed on the community certificate issued to another member of the family even in the year 1969 by the Tahsildhar of Tiruchirapalli. Therefore, it is evident that the family of the respondent have been residents of Tiruchirapalli District for over 60 years now. Hence,
2/4
Review Aplc. (MD)No.202 of 2023
we opined that the action of the Revenue Divisional Officer in requiring the respondent to apply to the Officers at her native District namely, Namakkal is uncalled for. We had also found that the claim made by the respondent that there is no one belonging to Kattunayakkan community in Karur District is evidently false.
(R.S.M., J.) (L.V.G., J.) 07.03.2024
kkn
Internet:Yes/No Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation :Yes/No
3/4
Review Aplc. (MD)No.202 of 2023 R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.
and L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J.
KKN
Review Aplc.(MD) No.202 of 2023 and W.M.P.(MD)No.19644 of 2023
07.03.2024
4/4
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the grounds raised satisfy the requirements of Order 47 CPC for reviewing the earlier order directing issuance of an ST (Hindu Kattunayakkan) community certificate.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
The District Collector, Office of the District Collectorate, Karur District
The Revenue Divisional Officer, Karur District, Karur
R.Shreya
R. Subramanian
L. Victoria Gowri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
