Review application dismissed as it sought to re-open decided questions in a different form without showing any error on the face of record.
Review application dismissed, no costs, connected miscellaneous petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Rev.Aplc(MD)No.91 of 2024
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 27.08.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN and THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI
Rev. Aplc(MD)No.91 of 2024 in W.A(MD)No.1345 of 2024 and
C.M.P(MD)Nos.11247 to 11249 of 2024
Rev. D.Soundarapandiyan
... Review Petitioner/Appellant/Petitioner
-vs-
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis _____________ Page 1 of 4_
Rev.Aplc(MD)No.91 of 2024
5.S.Gnathiraviam,
Secretary, Standing Committee on Higher Education, St. Jon's College Boys Hostel Campus, North High Ground Road, Diocesan Officer, Palayamkottai – 627 002.
... Respondents/Respondents/Respondents
PRAYER: Review Application filed under Order 47 Rule 1 of C.P.C., to review
the order dated 08.08.2024 made in W.A(MD)No.1345 of 2024.
| For Applicant | : Mr.G.Prabhu Rajadurai for Ms.M.Murugeswari |
|---|---|
| For R-1 | : Mr.V.S.Kishokkumar |
| For R-2 & R-3 | : Mr.S.P.Maharajan, Special Government Pleader |
| For R-4 | : Mr.P.P.Alwin Balan |
| For R-5 | : Mr.M.Mahaboob Athiff |
ORDER
[Judgment of the Court was made by R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.]
This review application is filed to review the judgment of this Court dated 08.08.2024 made in W.A(MD)No.1345 of 2024.
2. In the guise of review, the petitioner seeks to re-open the entire question that was decided by us. We had dismissed the writ appeal on the ground that the writ petition itself was not maintainable since it was beyond
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis _____________ Page 2 of 4_
Rev.Aplc(MD)No.91 of 2024
the parameters fixed by the Full Bench in D.Bright Joseph vs. Church of South Indian (CSI) Synod Secretariat, represented by its General
Secretary and Others reported in 2024 SCC OnLine Mad 286 . The additional ground was that The Tamil Nadu Private Schools Regulation Act or the Rules will not apply to the institutions run by the minorities.
3. Review Application in effect seeks to re-agitate the very same questions in a different form. We do not find any reason to entertain this review application since we do not find any error on the face of record. Accordingly, this review application is dismissed. No Costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.
[R.S.M., J.] [L.V.G., J.]
27.08.2024
NCC :Yes/No Index :Yes/No internet :Yes PM
To:
1.The Director of College Education, DPI Compound, College Road, Chennai.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis _____________ Page 3 of 4_
Rev.Aplc(MD)No.91 of 2024
R.SUBRAMANIAN, J. and L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J.
pm
Rev.Aplc(md)No.91 of 2024
27.08.2024
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis _____________ Page 4 of 4_
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a review application filed to re-agitate questions already decided without error on the face of record should be entertained.
Whether the Private Schools Regulation Act applies to minority institutions.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
D.Bright Joseph vs. Church of South Indian (CSI) Synod Secretariat, represented by its General Secretary and OthersReferred¶1
D.Bright Joseph vs. Church of South Indian (CSI) Synod Secretariat, represented by its General Secretary and Others reported in 2024 SCC OnLine Mad 286
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rev.D.Soundarapandiyan
The Correspondent, Sarah Tucker College, Palayamkottai
The Director of College Education, Chennai
The Regional Director of College Education, Tirunelveli
Rev. Dr.ARGST, Barnabas
S.Gnathiraviam
R.SUBRAMANIAN
L.VICTORIA GOWRI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
