Appeal against a commercial court judgment was withdrawn after the parties amicably settled the matter; the appeal was dismissed as settled out of court with no order as to costs, and the connected miscellaneous petition was closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
O.S.A.(CAD).No.28 of 2024
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 27.03.2024
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.SUBRAMANIAN
AND
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R.SAKTHIVEL
O.S.A.(CAD).No.28 of 2024 and
C.M.P.No.5394 of 2024
1.Religare Finvest Ltd., D-3, P3B District Centre, Saket, New Delhi – 110 017.
2.R.Rajeswaran ... Appellants
Vs.
Vikram Aggarwal ... Respondent
Prayer : Original Side Appeal (Commercial Appellate Division) filed under Section 13(1) of the Commercial Courts Act, against the judgment and decree passed in A.No.2287 of 2023 in C.S. (Comm.Div.) No.471 of 2019 dated 12.12.2023.
For Appellants : Mr.A.Muthusubramaniam For Respondent : Mr.Najeeb Usman Khan for M/s.P.J.George
1/3
O.S.A.(CAD).No.28 of 2024
J U D G M E N T
(Judgment of the Court was delivered by R.SUBRAMANIAN, J.)
The learned counsel for the appellants would submit that the parties
have amicably settled the matter and seeks permission to withdraw this appeal.
2. In view of the same, this appeal is dismissed as settled out of
Court. There shall be no order as to costs in this appeal. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
(R.S.M., J.) (R.S.V., J.) dsa 27.03.2024 Index : No Internet : Yes Neutral Citation : No Non-Speaking order
2/3
O.S.A.(CAD).No.28 of 2024
R.SUBRAMANIAN, J. and R.SAKTHIVEL, J.
dsa
O.S.A.(CAD).No.28 of 2024
27.03.2024
3/3
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Religare Finvest Ltd.
R.Rajeswaran
Vikram Aggarwal
R.Subramanian
R.Sakthivel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
