Disposed

M/S.Neyveli Lignite Corporation v. M/S.J.K.Fenner (India) Limited

Madras HC3 Jun 2024OSA/179/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court disposed of appeals under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, noting that the parties have entered into a settlement under the Vivadh Se Vishwas II (Contractual Disputes) Scheme. The appeals were closed to allow the settlement to be concluded, with no view expressed on merits.

What did the court decide?

Appeals disposed of as closed to facilitate settlement under Vivadh Se Vishwas II Scheme.

M/S.Neyveli Lignite Corporation Vs M/S.J.K.Fenner (India) Limited — Arbitration | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

O.S.A. Nos. 179 & 267 of 2020

¶2

& C.M.P. No.9057 of 2020 in O.S.A. No. 179 of 2020

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

¶4

DATED: 03.06.2024

¶5

CORAM

¶6

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. SUNDAR

¶7

AND

¶8

THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K. GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI

¶9

O.S.A. Nos. 179 & 267 of 2020

¶10

& C.M.P. No.9057 of 2020 in O.S.A. No. 179 of 2020

¶11

O.S.A. No. 179 of 2020

¶12

M/s. Neyveli Lignite Corporation, (Presently known as M/s.NLC India Limited), Neyveli House, No. 135, Periyar EVK High Road, Kilpauk, Chennai – 600 010, Presently at First Floor, No.8, Mayor Sathyamurthy road, FSD, Egmore Complex of Food Corporation of India, Chennai – 600 031.

..Appellant

Vs.

1\10

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶17

O.S.A. Nos. 179 & 267 of 2020

¶18

& C.M.P. No.9057 of 2020 in O.S.A. No. 179 of 2020

¶19

M/s.J.K. Fenner (India) Limited, Formerly known as Fenner India Limited, Having its Corporate Office at 5^th Floor, Khivraj Complex – II, No.480, Anna Salai, Nandanam, Chennai – 600 035 represented by Mr.R. Krishnan Vice President (F&A) 2. Hon'ble Mr.Justice S. Ranganathan (Retd.) Presiding Arbitrator, Former Judge, Supreme Court of India, New No.42, Old No. 32, Bhaktavatsalam Road, Mylapore, Chennai 600 004. 3. Hon'ble Mr.Justice B.P. Jeevan Reddy (Retd.) Arbitrator, Former Judge, Supreme Court of India, Plot No. 301, Road No. 25, Jubilee Hills, HSG Society, Opp. To Obul Reddy Public School, Hyderabad 500 033. 4. Hon'ble Mr. Justice K. Govindarajan (Retd.) Arbitrator, Former Judge, Madras High Court, Malaviya Avenue, Shastri Nagar, Chennai 600 041. ..Respondents

¶20

2\10

¶21

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶22

O.S.A. Nos. 179 & 267 of 2020 & C.M.P. No.9057 of 2020 in O.S.A. No. 179 of 2020

¶23

Prayer: Original Side Appeal under Section XXXVI Rule 1 of Original

¶24

Side Rules r/w Clause 15 of the Letters Patent as against the order dated 20.05.2020 passed in Arb.O.P. No. 252 of 2014.

¶25

For Appellant :: Mr.N. Nithianandam For Respondents :: Ms. R.S. Pornima for Ms. Preeti Mohan for R1

¶26

O.S.A. No. 267 of 2020

¶27

M/s.J.K. Fenner (India) Limited, Formerly known as Fenner (India) Limited, Having its Corporate Office at 5^th Floor, Khivraj Complex – 11, No.480, Anna Salai, Nandanam, Chennai – 600 035 represented by Mr.R. Vijayaraghavan Company Secretary ..Appellant Vs.

¶28

M/s. Neyveli Lignite Corporation, Neyveli House, 135, Periyar EVK High Road, Kilpauk, Chennai 600 010. ..Respondent

¶29

Prayer: Original Side Appeal under Section XXXVI Rule 1 of Original

¶30

Side Rules r/w Clause 15 of the Letters Patent as against the order dated 20.05.2020 passed in Arb.O.P. No. 252 of 2014.

¶31

3\10

¶32

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶33

J U D G M E N T

¶34

O.S.A. Nos. 179 & 267 of 2020 & C.M.P. No.9057 of 2020 in O.S.A. No. 179 of 2020

¶35

(Delivered by M. SUNDAR,J.)

¶36

This common order will now give a quietus to the captioned two

¶37

'Original Side Appeals' ('O.S.As' in plural and 'O.S.A' in singular for the sake of brevity) and the captioned C.M.P. in one of the captioned O.S.As.

¶38

Both captioned O.S.As are statutory appeals under Section 37 of 'The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996' ('A & C Act' for the sake of brevity). Both O.S.As are directed against an order dated 20.05.2020 made in O.P. No. 252 of 2014 by a Section 34 Court. While O.S.A. No. 179 of 2020 has been preferred by 'Neyveli Lignite Corporation' ('NLC' for the sake of brevity) i.e., contesting respondent before Section 34 Court, O.S.A. No. 267 of 2020 has been preferred by J.K. FENNER (INDIA) LIMITED, which was the petitioner before Section 34 Court.

¶39

Today, Mr.N. Nithianandam, learned counsel for NLC and

¶40

Ms. R.S. Pornima, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Ms. Preeti 4\10

¶41

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶42

O.S.A. Nos. 179 & 267 of 2020

¶43

& C.M.P. No.9057 of 2020 in O.S.A. No. 179 of 2020

¶44

Mohan, learned counsel for J.K. FENNER (INDIA) LIMITED are before us. While Mr.N. Nithianandam, learned counsel for NLC is before us in the Physical Court, Ms.R.S. Pornima, learned counsel for 1^st respondent is before us on 'VC' (Video Conferencing) platform. To be noted, this is a hybrid hearing which is a regular/routine/daily feature in this Court.

¶45

It may not be necessary to dilate further on facts or other aspects of the matter as both aforementioned learned counsel submit that J.K. FENNER (INDIA) LIMITED, which is the contractor has resorted to Vivadh Se Vishwas II (Contractual Disputes) Scheme as regards that claim of the contractor which was negatived. Both counsel also submit that settlement offer has been accepted and J.K.FENNER (INDIA) LIMITED has now been given time for withdrawal of the case so that settlement can be carried to its logical end as NLC has accepted the claim of J.K. FENNER (INDIA) LIMITED.

¶46

5\10

¶47

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶48

O.S.A. Nos. 179 & 267 of 2020

¶49

& C.M.P. No.9057 of 2020 in O.S.A. No. 179 of 2020

¶50

Learned counsel for NLC has placed before us an office memorandum issued by the Ministry of Finance, Government of India, dated 29.05.2023 qua Vivadh Se Vishwas II (Contractual Disputes) Scheme and both sides submit that it is in step 4 of the Scheme.

¶51

In the aforesaid backdrop, learned counsel for Contractor namely, J.K. FENNER (INDIA) LIMITED submitted that she has instructions to withdraw O.S.A. No. 267 of 2020 so that settlement can be carried to its logical end. This submission is recorded.

¶52

In the light of the above submission, learned counsel for NLC has also withdrawn O.S.A. of NLC i.e, O.S.A No. 179 of 2020 and C.M.P. thereat. Learned counsel for NLC has made endorsements in the case file and a scanned reproduction of the endorsements is as hereunder:

¶53

6\10

¶54

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶55

O.S.A. Nos. 179 & 267 of 2020

¶56

& C.M.P. No.9057 of 2020 in O.S.A. No. 179 of 2020

¶57

7\10

¶58

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶59

O.S.A. Nos. 179 & 267 of 2020

¶60

& C.M.P. No.9057 of 2020 in O.S.A. No. 179 of 2020

¶61

We make it clear that the claim of contractor which has been admitted by NLC shall be concluded by carrying it to its logical end as expeditiously as possible within indictated timelines in Vivadh Se Vishwas II (Contractual Disputes) Scheme.

¶62

8\10

¶63

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶64

O.S.A. Nos. 179 & 267 of 2020

¶65

& C.M.P. No.9057 of 2020 in O.S.A. No. 179 of 2020

¶66

Captioned O.S.As and captioned C.M.P. are disposed of as closed in the aforesaid manner. Though obvious, we make it clear that we have not expressed any view or opinion on the merits of the matter. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶67

¶68

(M.S.J.) (K.G.T.J.) 03.06.2024

¶69

P.S.I: Upload forthwith

¶70

P.S.II: All concerned including the Registry of Madras High Court to act forthwith on the uploaded soft copy of this proceedings as uploaded in the official website of this Court. To be noted, the soft copies uploaded in the official website of this Court are water marked, besides being QR coded.

¶71

M. SUNDAR,J.

¶72

9\10

¶73

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶74

O.S.A. Nos. 179 & 267 of 2020

¶75

& C.M.P. No.9057 of 2020 in O.S.A. No. 179 of 2020

¶76

AND

¶77

K. GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI,J.

¶78

¶79

O.S.A. Nos. 179 & 267 of 2020 & C.M.P. No.9057 of 2020 in O.S.A. No. 179 of 2020

¶80

03.06.2024

¶81

10\10

¶82

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

M/S.Neyveli Lignite Corporation v. M/S.J.K.Fenner (India) Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S.Neyveli Lignite Corporation v. M/S.J.K.Fenner (India) Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Selvarani Vs Rajathi

M/S. Tristar Accommodations Pvt.Ltd Vs Vatsala Jagannathan

Canadian Crystaline Water India Limited Vs Craze(India) Private Limited

C. Prakash Vs S.N.Media

The Chairperson Vs v. Manoharan

The Oriental Insurance Company Ltd. Vs Syndicate Bottles Pvt. Ltd.