S.Aparna v. Sugathan M and 2 others
Case brief
What is this about?
In an interim injunction application, the court held that no further adjudication is required due to an order passed in a connected matter and closed the application without disposing of the specific injunction request.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
O.A.No.1095 of 2023
O.A.No.1095 of 2023 in C.S.No.244 of 2023
N.SATHISH KUMAR,J.
This Application has been filed to grant an interim injunction restraining the respondents, their men, agents, servants representatives and persons acting for on behalf of the respondents from in any manner alienating or encumbering the Suit schedule property.
2.In view of the order passed in A.No.248 of 2024, no further adjudication is required in this application and hence, the same is closed.
22.01.2024
pbn
1/1
Coram
N.SATHISH KUMAR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court