S.Rajini Vs
Case brief
What is this about?
The court closed civil insolvency application no. 10 of 2018 after learning from revenue authorities that the appellant had not resided in the specified property for six years, making recovery of proceedings costs impossible under the Revenue Recovery Act.
What did the court decide?
Closing of the proceedings due to inability to locate the respondent for recovery of costs.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IP. 10 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 09-12-2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE P.B. BALAJI
IP. 10 of 2018
S.RAJINI
W/O.S.SRINIVASAN, NO.573-B 27TH LANE TNHB COLONY VELACHERY CHENNAI 600 042
APPELLANT(S)
IP. 10 of 2018
For Appellant(s): M/S.SIVAKUMAR A.SHYAM GANESH For Respondent(s):
M/S.P.J.ANITHA S.SAM ARTHER JEBAKUMAR FOR SECURED CREDITORS 1 & 2 & FOR UNSECURED CREDITORS 1 &2 M/S.R.C.PAUL KANAGARAJ P.J.ANITHA S.SAM ARTHUR JEBAKUMAR R.DIVYA PRIYA FOR UNSECURED CRE.9 10 & 35 S.SAM ARTHUR JEBAKUMAR FOR UNSEC.CRE.3,4,14,15,17,19,20,24,25,27,36TO38,42,45,50,51,54, SEC.CR.NO 4,7,8 M/S. P.GURUNATHAN ADDL.GOVT.PLEADER (CS)
Parties & counsel
- appellant
S. Rajini
Coram
P.B. Balaji
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court