Habeas corpus petition challenging the preventive detention of the petitioner's son under an order dated 10.01.2024. Both sides produced a Government Order dated 15.02.2024 showing the detention order had been revoked. The Court recorded the submission and dismissed the petition as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
H.C.P.No.130 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 13.06.2024
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH
AND
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN
H.C.P.No.130 of 2024
Abdhul Nazar
... Petitioner
Vs.
1.The Secretary to the Government Home, Prohibition and Excise Department Secretariat Chennai-9
2.District Magistrate and District Collector of The Nilgiris District, Udhagamandalam
3.The Superintendent of Police The Nilgiris District, Udhagamandalam
4.The Superintendent of Prison Central Prison, Coimbatore
5.The Inspector of Police Masinagudi Police Station The Nilgiris District ... Respondents
PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to
Page 1 of 4
H.C.P.No.130 of 2024
issue a writ of Habeas Corpus, calling for the records in connection with the order of Detention passed by the second respondent dated 10.01.2024 in Cr.M.P.No.01/2024 against the petitioner's son Basil, Zaman, Male aged 26 years, S/o.Abdhul Nazar, who is confined at Central Prison, Coimbatore and set aside the same and direct the respondents to produce the detenu before this Court and set him at liberty.
For Petitioner : M/s.D.Balaji For Respondents : Mr.E.Raj Thilak,
Additional Public Prosecutor
ORDER
M.S.RAMESH, J. AND SUNDER MOHAN, J.
When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner, as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents, by producing a copy of the Government Order in G.O.Rt.No.913, Home, Prohibition and Excise (X) Department, dated 15.02.2024, submitted that the detention order has already been revoked.
Page 2 of 4
H.C.P.No.130 of 2024
dismissed as infructuous.
[M.S.R., J] [S.M., J] 13.06.2024
Index: Yes/No Neutral Citation
kas To
1.The Secretary to the Government Home, Prohibition and Excise Department Secretariat Chennai-9
2.District Magistrate and District Collector of The Nilgiris District, Udhagamandalam
3.The Superintendent of Police The Nilgiris District, Udhagamandalam
4.The Superintendent of Prison Central Prison, Coimbatore
5.The Inspector of Police Masinagudi Police Station The Nilgiris District
6.The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras Chennai 600 104
Page 3 of 4
H.C.P.No.130 of 2024
M.S.RAMESH, J. and SUNDER MOHAN, J.
kas
H.C.P.No.130 of 2024
13.06.2024
Page 4 of 4
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the habeas corpus petition challenging the detention order dated 10.01.2024 survives after the detention was revoked by the Government.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Abdhul Nazar
The Secretary to the Government, Home, Prohibition and Excise Department, Secretariat, Chennai-9
District Magistrate and District Collector of The Nilgiris District, Udhagamandalam
The Superintendent of Police, The Nilgiris District, Udhagamandalam
The Superintendent of Prison, Central Prison, Coimbatore
The Inspector of Police, Masinagudi Police Station, The Nilgiris District
M.S. Ramesh
Sunder Mohan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
