Partition suit for division of scheduled properties and permanent injunction was decreed in terms of a memorandum of compromise dated 08.01.2024, which both parties admitted before the Court; the connected application was closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.S.No.76 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Dated : 08.01.2024
CORAM
THE HON`BLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR
C.S.No.76 of 2023
&
OA.No.329 of 2023
Mrs.Ranjitha Prakash .. Plaintiff
Vs.
Mr.L.Rajesh Harsha
.. Defendant
Civil Suit filed under Order IV Rule 1 of Original Side Rules 1956
read with Order VII Rule 1 CPC praying for the following judgment and decree against the defendants :
i] To divide the plant schedule mentioned properties into 2 equal
shares and to allot one such share to the plaintiff by metes and bounds and put the plaintiff under separate possession and enjoyment of her respective share through process of law:
1/4
C.S.No.76 of 2023
ii] To appoint an Advocate/Commissioner to effect the partition
iii] for a permanent injunction against the defendant restraining him
and his men and agents from making any kind of encumbrance over the schedule mentioned properties or making any kind of alteration/construction work in the schedule mentioned properties;
iv] for costs of the suit
For Plaintiffs : Mr.M.Gnanasekar
For defendants : Mrs.S.Umamaheswari – D2 & D3
J U D G M E N T
This suit has been filed for partition and separate possession and for
permanent injunction to restrain the defendant from making any encumbrance, alteration or construction in the suit schedule properties and and for costs.
2/4
C.S.No.76 of 2023
plaintiff and the defendant submitted that the parties have entered into a memorandum of compromise and the suit may be decreed in terms of the Memorandum of Compromise entered between the parties. The plaintiff and defendant are also present before this Court and they also admitted the memorandum of compromise entered between them.
decree. Consequently, the connected application is closed.
08.01.2024
vrc
3/4
C.S.No.76 of 2023
N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.
vrc
C.S.No.76 of 2023
08.01.2024
4/4
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the partition suit could be decreed in terms of the memorandum of compromise entered into between the parties.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mrs.Ranjitha Prakash
Mr.L.Rajesh Harsha
N.Sathish Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
