Disposed

R.Rajangam, v. M/S.Gowri Tourist Home (P) Ltd.

Madras HC28 Feb 2024CRP(MD)/796/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Revision petitions seeking striking off a plaint and setting aside an interim order in a Dindigul suit. The respondent counsel informed the court the suit was already disposed; recording this, the High Court closed the petitions with liberty to file restoration if any dispute arose.

What did the court decide?

Petitions closed without adjudication; liberty to file restoration petition if dispute over disposal.

R.Rajangam, Vs M/S.Gowri Tourist Home (P) Ltd. — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

C.R.P.(MD)Nos.796 & 797 of 2015

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED :28.02.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN

¶6

C.R.P.(MD).Nos.796 & 797 of 2015

¶7

and M.P.(MD).Nos.1 & 1 of 2015

¶8

C.R.P.(MD).No.796 of 2015

R.Rajangam

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.M/s.Gowri Tourist Home (P) Ltd., Rep by its Managing Director, N.Vanchimuthu

¶13

2.S.Subburayulu

¶14

3.S.Rajarethini ... Respondents

¶15

PRAYER : Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, to stuck of the plaint in O.S.No.205 of 2015 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Dindigul dated 16.03.2015.

¶16

For Petitioner :Mr.M.P.Senthil For Respondents :Mr.V.Janakiramulu for R1

¶17

¶18

1/4

¶19

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶20

C.R.P.(MD)Nos.796 & 797 of 2015

¶21

C.R.P.(MD).No.797 of 2015

R.Rajangam

... Petitioner

Vs.

1.M/s.Gowri Tourist Home (P) Ltd., Rep by its Managing Director, N.Vanchimuthu ... Respondent

¶26

PRAYER : Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, to set aside the order passed in I.A.No.195 of 2015 in O.S.No.205 of 2015, on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Dindigul dated 16.03.2015.

¶27

For Petitioner :Mr.M.P.Senthil

¶28

For Respondents :Mr.V.Janakiramulu for R1

¶29

COMMON ORDER

¶30

These Civil Revision Petitions have been filed to set aside the

¶31

order passed in I.A.No.195 of 2015 in O.S.No.205 of 2015, on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Dindigul, dated 16.03.2015.

¶32

Today, when these matters are taken up for hearing, the learned

¶33

counsel appearing for the respondent submits that the petitioner filed an

¶34

2/4

¶35

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶36

C.R.P.(MD)Nos.796 & 797 of 2015

¶37

application struck of the plaint in O.S.No.205 of 2015, on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Dindigul. As per the instructions of the respondent, who is the plaintiff in the suit, the suit was already disposed.

¶38

Recording the same, these Civil Revision Petitions are closed. If

¶39

any dispute relating to the disposal, the parties are at liberty to file restoration petition, if they are so advised. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed.

¶40

28.02.2024

¶41

NCC :Yes / No Index :Yes / No Internet :Yes / No

¶42

sbn

¶43

To.

¶44

1.The Principal District Munsif Court, Dindigul

¶45

3/4

¶46

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶47

C.R.P.(MD)Nos.796 & 797 of 2015

¶48

K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN, J.

¶49

sbn

¶50

C.R.P.(MD).Nos.796 & 797 of 2015 and M.P.(MD).Nos.1 & 1 of 2015

¶51

28.02.2024

¶52

4/4

¶53

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

R.Rajangam, v. M/S.Gowri Tourist Home (P) Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

R.Rajangam, v. M/S.Gowri Tourist Home (P) Ltd.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bharani Raj Vs The Inspector of Police

K.Mandiramadathi, Vs K.Murugaraj

Mrs.Kavitha Vs The Inspector of Police

Govindan R.T Vs the Superintendent of Police

Srimathy Vs Karthick

Poonagavanam Vs Pappayee