S.Arul Dhas, v. F.Hubert
Case brief
What is this about?
Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 226 was dismissed as the petitioner had died, leading to abatement of the proceedings.
What did the court decide?
Civil Revision Petition dismissed as abated. No costs.
What the court decided
C.R.P(MD)No.767 of 2015(NPD)
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
Dated : 12.02.2024
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN
C.R.P.(MD)No.767 of 2015
S.Arul Dhas
... Petitioner/2nd Defendant
Vs.
1.F.Hubert 2.Lilly Stella Bai
...1st Respondent/Plaintiff ... 2nd Respondent/1st Defendant
Prayer: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, against the ex-party judgment and decree, dated 06.02.2003 passed in O.S.No.349 of 2004 on the file of the I Additional Sub-Court, Nagercoil.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
S. Arul Dhas
- respondent
F. Hubert
- respondent
Lilly Stella Bai
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court