Disposed

Shanmugasundaram, v. Ramadurai

Madras HC12 Mar 2024CRP(MD)/667/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Civil revision petition against issuance of notice to respondents in a delay-condonation petition pending four years. The High Court did not rule on the notice question but directed the Subordinate Judge, Sivagangai, to dispose of the petition within 15 days and disposed of the revision accordingly.

What did the court decide?

Direction to Subordinate Judge, Sivagangai to dispose of I.A.No.633 of 2018 within 15 days; CRP disposed of without costs.

Shanmugasundaram, Vs Ramadurai — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

C.R.P(MD)No.667 of 2024

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 12.03.2024

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN

¶6

C.R.P(MD)No.667 of 2024

¶7

Shanmugasundaram ... Petitioner

¶8

¶9

1.Ramadurai 2.Selvasivagami 3.Chinnammal ... Respondents

¶10

Prayer : Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the order of issuing notice to the respondents in the petition to condone the delay to the respondents in I.A.No.633 of 2018 in O.S.S.R.No.5561 of 2018(Unnumbered plaint) dated 28.11.2018 and pass an order directing the Subordinate Judge, Sivagangai, to take the plaint on file after condoning the delay.

¶11

For Petitioner : Mr.D.Parisuthanathan

¶12

1/4

¶13

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶14

C.R.P(MD)No.667 of 2024

¶15

ORDER

¶16

This Civil Revision Petition is filed to call for the records pertaining to set aside the order of issuing notice to the respondents in the petition to condone the delay to the respondents in I.A.No.633 of 2018 in O.S.S.R.No.5561 of 2018(Unnumbered plaint) dated 28.11.2018 and pass an order directing the learned Subordinate Judge, Sivagangai, to take the plaint on file after condoning the delay.

¶17

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that aggrieved over the long pendency of I.A.No.633 of 2018 which was filed by the petitioner to condone the delay of 298 days in making the representation, this Civil Revision Petition is filed.

¶18

Learned counsel for the respondent would submit that representation delay is a matter between the Court and the petitioner for which no notice is required to be sent to the opposite party.

¶19

However, notice was sent and the opposite party was also entered appearance. The matter is kept pending without any progress for

¶20

2/4

¶21

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶22

C.R.P(MD)No.667 of 2024

¶23

the past four years. There shall be a direction to the learned Subordinate Judge, Sivagangai, to dispose of the petition within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶24

With this direction, this Civil Revision Petition is disposed of.

¶25

No costs.

¶26

12.03.2024 NCC :Yes/No Index :Yes/No Internet : Yes/ No pnn

¶27

¶28

1.The Subordinate Judge, Sivagangai.

¶29

2.The Section Officer, VR Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶30

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶31

3/4

¶32

C.R.P(MD)No.667 of 2024

¶33

G.ILANGOVAN, J.

¶34

pnn

¶35

ORDER IN C.R.P(MD)No.667 of 2024

¶36

12.03.2024

¶37

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶38

4/4

Shanmugasundaram, v. Ramadurai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shanmugasundaram, v. Ramadurai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

S.Kumar Vs Anbukkarasi

A.Suriyanarayani, Vs v.Sivahariprammasankar

P.R.Jawaharlal Vs K.G.Ramila

M/S.Rathi Agencies Vs the Indian Cements Ltd.

T. Pandi Sree Vs S.Thambidurai

V.K.Raman Vs S.Bakthavatchalam @ Sumangali Sampath