Dismissed

P.Kanakambika v. the State of Tamilnadu

Madras HC19 Nov 2024CRP(MD)/639/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court dismissed a Civil Revision Petition filed to set aside an order in an application for suit, holding that the matter became infructuous as the underlying suit was remitted for fresh consideration and an appeal was preferred. No costs awarded. Quality: thin

What did the court decide?

The Civil Revision Petition was dismissed as infructuous. No costs awarded to any party.

P.Kanakambika Vs the State of Tamilnadu — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

C.R.P(MD)No.639 of 2021

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 19.11.2024

¶4

CORAM :

¶5

THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN

¶6

C.R.P(MD)No.639 of 2021

¶7

P.Kanakambika

¶8

P.Sumangala Amma

¶9

P.Suseela Amma ... Petitioner / Respondent

¶10

The State of Tamilnadu represented by the District Collector, Kanyakumari District. ... Respondent / Appellant

¶11

Prayer : This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Section 115 of C.P.C., to set aside the order in IA.No.84 of 2018 in AS.SR.No.5461 of 2018 dated 20.02.2020 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Judge, Nagercoil.

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr.P.Puhazh Gandhi

¶13

For Respondent : Mr.N.Ramesh Arumugam Government Advocate

¶14

1/4

¶15

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶16

C.R.P(MD)No.639 of 2021

¶17

ORDER

¶18

This Civil Revision Petition is filed to set aside the order in IA.No. 84 of 2018 in AS.SR.No.5461 of 2018 dated 20.02.2020 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Judge, Nagercoil.

¶19

When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned Government

¶20

Advocate would submit that against the decree passed by the trial Court, an appeal was preferred in A.S.No.4 of 2020 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Judge, Nagercoil. The matter was remitted back to the trial Court for fresh consideration by the judgment and decree dated 21.06.2022. Therefore, the matter has become infructuous.

¶21

In view of the above submissions, this Civil Revision Petition is

¶22

dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

¶23

19.11.2024

¶24

NCC :Yes/No Index :Yes/No Internet : Yes/ No

¶25

pnn

¶26

2/4

¶27

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶28

C.R.P(MD)No.639 of 2021

¶29

¶30

1.The Principal Subordinate Judge, Nagercoil.

¶31

2.The Section Officer, VR Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶32

3/4

¶33

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶34

C.R.P(MD)No.639 of 2021

¶35

G.ILANGOVAN, J.

¶36

pnn

¶37

ORDER IN C.R.P(MD)No.639 of 2021

¶38

19.11.2024

¶39

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶40

4/4

P.Kanakambika v. the State of Tamilnadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

P.Kanakambika v. the State of Tamilnadu

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P. Marimuthu, Vs S. Anbuselvi

A. Subramanian Vs Thiruvaiyaru Selection Grade

M.Ravichandran Vs R. Paramasivan

P.Rajendran Vs S.Ravichandran

R.Booma Vs The State of Tamilnadu

Karuppusamy, Vs Anitha