Civil revision petitions against interim orders in a pending suit were closed as infructuous after counsel informed the court that the underlying suit had already been disposed of, leaving nothing for adjudication. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 06.08.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN
CRP(MD)Nos.493 & 494 of 2021 and CMP(MD)Nos.2644 & 2655 of 2021
Thirumoorthy ... Petitioner in both cases
Vs.
P.Gunasekaran ... Respondent in both cases
Common Prayer: Civil Revision Petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the order and decreetal order dated 23.10.2019 made in I.A Nos.299 of 2019 and 300 of 2019 in O.S No.246 of 2011 on the file of the Additional Sub Court, Karur.
in both cases : -
For Petitioner : Mr.V.Nagarajan
For Respondent : Mr.V.Balaji
1/3
COMMON ORDER
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner informs the court that since the suit itself was disposed of on 12.01.2023, nothing survives for further adjudication in these civil revision petitions. They stand closed as infructuous. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
06.08.2024 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No SKM
2/3
G.R.SWAMINATHAN,J.
SKM
CRP(MD)Nos.493 & 494 of 2021 and CMP(MD)Nos.2644 & 2655 of 2021
06.08.2024
3/3
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Thirumoorthy
P.Gunasekaran
G.R.Swaminathan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
