Disposed

K.Farook Abdullah v. M.Syed Abudaheer

Madras HC22 Feb 2024CRP(MD)/488/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Revision petition seeking expeditious disposal of a 2019 suit for declaration and mandatory injunction pending at Thirumangalam. The court directed the District Munsif to complete enquiry of all pending interlocutory applications within four months and disposed of the petition.

What did the court decide?

Direction to District Munsif, Thirumangalam to expedite pending interlocutory applications in O.S.No.45 of 2019 within four months; no costs.

K.Farook Abdullah Vs M.Syed Abudaheer — Property and Title | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

C.R.P.(MD)No.488 of 2024

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED: 22.02.2024

¶4

CORAM

¶5

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN

¶6

C.R.P.(MD)No.488 of 2024

¶7

K.Farook Abdullah ... Petitioner/2^nd Defendant

¶8

Vs.

¶9

1.M.Syed Abudaheer ... 1^st Respondent/Plaintiff

¶10

2.S.Kaja Mohaideen (Died),

¶11

.. 2^nd Respondent/1^st Defendant

¶12

3.K.Umar Farook Abdullah 4.S.G.M.Sha, 5.Fathimakani,

¶13

6.The Sub Registrar, Madurai Road, Thirumangalam Town, Madurai District.

¶14

7.The District Registrar, Madurai Town, Madurai District. ... Respondents 3 to 7/ Respondents 3 to 7

¶15

PRAYER : Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, to call for the records for disposal of the original

¶16

1/4

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

C.R.P.(MD)No.488 of 2024

¶19

suit in O.S.No.45 of 2019 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Thirumangalam as early as possible and allow the Civil Revision Petition.

¶20

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Senthil Kumar For Respondents : Mr.J.Ashok for R6 & R7 Additional Government Pleader

¶21

ORDER

¶22

Seeking direction to the learned District Munsif, Thirumangalam,

¶23

to expedite the trial process in O.S.No.45 of 2019 on its file within a time frame as may be fixed by this Court, this petition is filed.

¶24

2.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that originally the suit was filed by the first respondent herein as plaintiff before the learned District Munsif, Thirumangalam, seeking declaration declaring the plaint mentioned documents as not valid and for mandatory injunction, in the year 2019. Thereafter, it is pending for very long time without any progress. He would further submits that there are so many interlocutory applications have been filed in this case and are pending without any progress.

¶25

2/4

¶26

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶27

C.R.P.(MD)No.488 of 2024

¶28

3.Considering the oldness of the matter, there shall be a direction

¶29

to the learned District Munsif, Thirumangalam, to expedite the enquiry process in all the interlocutory applications pending in the O.S.No.45 of 2019 within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶30

4.With the above said directions, this civil revision petition stands

¶31

disposed of. No costs.

¶32

22.02.2024 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No TM

¶33

¶34

1.The District Munsif, Thirumangalam.

¶35

2.The Section Officer, E.R.Section/V.R.Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

¶36

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶37

3/4

¶38

C.R.P.(MD)No.488 of 2024

¶39

G.ILANGOVAN ,J.

¶40

¶41

C.R.P.(MD)No.488 of 2024

¶42

22.02.2024

¶43

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶44

4/4

K.Farook Abdullah v. M.Syed Abudaheer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K.Farook Abdullah v. M.Syed Abudaheer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

V. Bhuvaneshwari Vs G. Varatharajaperumal

Sudali @ Sasikala, Vs The Tahsildar

A.P.D.K. Devanand Vs Sornashanthi

Anthony Benildus Vs John Bosco

Renganathan Vs Devi

Dharmaraj Vs Krishnamoorthy