The Madras High Court dismissed a civil revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution as infructuous because the underlying suit and interim application had already been allowed, leaving no surviving question for adjudication.
Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.R.P.(MD)No.479 of 2020
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 06.06.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE L.VICTORIA GOWRI
C.R.P.(MD)No.479 of 2020
S.S.Subramaniam, ... Petitioner / Petitioner / Appellant
Vs.
1.A.G.Anila Daniel
2.Daniel
3.A.S.Subramanian 4.S.Subramanian ... Respondents/ Respondents/ Respondents
PRAYER : Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, to set aside the fair and decreetal order passed in I.A.No.3 of 2019 in A.S.No.61 of 2017 in O.S.No.271 of 2012 dated 04.01.2020 on the file of the 2nd Additional Sub Court, Nagercoil by allowing this Civil Revision Petition.
C.R.P.(MD)No.479 of 2020
For Petitioner : Mr.H.Arumugam For R-1 & R-2 : Mr.B.Tamil Nidhi
ORDER
When the Civil Revision Petition was taken up for hearing today i.e., on 06.06.2024, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that A.S.No.61 of 2017 on the file of the 2nd Additional Sub Court, Nagercoil has already been allowed. In view of the same, nothing survives for adjudication in this Civil Revision Petition.
infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs.
06.06.2024 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes Sml
C.R.P.(MD)No.479 of 2020
To
C.R.P.(MD)No.479 of 2020
L.VICTORIA GOWRI, J.
Sml
C.R.P.(MD)No.479 of 2020
06.06.2024
2 provisions across 1 enactments
S.S.Subramaniam
A.G.Anila Daniel
Daniel
A.S.Subramanian
S.Subramanian
L.Victoria Gowri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
