Disposed

Sundaraj v. Velani

Madras HC9 Dec 2024CRP(MD)/391/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is a single-paragraph order from the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court regarding a Civil Revision Petition. The court accepted the counsel's submission that no matter survives for disposals since the trial court had allowed an injunction during the pendency. The petition was disposed of with no costs, and the connected miscellaneous petition was closed. No substantive legal issue was dis

What the court decided

AI extract

Sundaraj Vs Velani — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶2

DATED: 09.12.2024

¶3

CORAM

¶4

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR

¶5

C.R.P.(MD)(PD)No.391 of 2021 and C.M.P.(MD)No.2120 of 2021

1.Sundraj

2.V.Arumugam

3.Malairaj

4.Ravichandran

... Petitioners

-vs.-

1.Velani 2.Alphonse

3.Government of Tamilnadu, Through its District Collector, District Collector Office, Sivagangai.

¶14

4.The Regional Development Officer, Regional Development Office (Village Panchayat), Ilayankudi.

¶15

5.The Project Officer, District Rural Development Office, District Collector Office, Sivagangai. ...Respondents

¶16

________________ Page 1 of 4_

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶18

PRAYER

¶19

PRAYER : Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India to call for the records pertaining to the order, dated 19.11.2020 passed in I.A.No.5 of 2020 in I.A.No.3 of 2020 in O.S.No.36 of 2020 on the file of the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Ilayankudi and to set aside the same.

¶20

For Petitioner :Mr.S.Rajasekar For R1 and R2 :Mr.S.Srinivasa Raghavan For R3 to R5 :Mr.K.S.Selvaganesan Additional Government Pleader *****

¶21

ORDER

¶22

When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Counsel for petitioner submitted that the present Revision Petition has been filed challenging the order passed in I.A.No.5 of 2020 in I.A.No.3 of 2020 to implead the proposed respondents 4 to 7 in I.A.No.3 of 2022, which is an injunction application. He further submitted that during the pendency of the Revision Petition, the trial Court has allowed the injunction application. Hence, Nothing survives in the Civil Revision Petition.

¶23

Page 2 of 4

¶24

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶25

Recording the submission made by the learned Counsel for petitioner, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶26

09.12.2024

¶27

Internet :Yes/No NCC :Yes/No Index :Yes/No

¶28

cmr

¶29

¶30

1.The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Ilayankudi.

¶31

2.The District Collector, Government of Tamilnadu, District Collector Office, Sivagangai.

¶32

3.The Regional Development Officer, Regional Development Office (Village Panchayat), Ilayankudi.

¶33

4.The Project Officer, District Rural Development Office, District Collector Office, Sivagangai.

¶34

________________ Page 3 of 4_

¶35

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

¶36

N.SENTHILKUMAR, J.

¶37

cmr

¶38

C.R.P.(MD)(PD)No.391 of 2021

¶39

09.12.2024

¶40

________________ Page 4 of 4_

¶41

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis

Sundaraj v. Velani

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Sundaraj v. Velani

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P.Rajesh Prasanna, Vs the Commissioner

P.F.Sumaiyya Banu Vs Syed Mohammed Maheen

G.Dhakshinamoorthy Vs Thavathiru Sadhu Shanmuga Adigalar

G.Ashok Pathy Vs D.Madanagopal

Gandhi Vs Gnanasekaran (died)

Mohamed Thajudeen @ Thajudeen,(Died) Vs Ummakollusu