Manimuthu v. Ayyammal
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court exercised supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 to direct the District Munsif to dispose of a pending execution petition within three months, noting the oldness of the matter and lack of produced stay orders.
What did the court decide?
Direction to dispose E.P.No.3 of 2023 within three months from receipt of order copy.
What the court decided
C.R.P(MD)No.3065 of 2024
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 05.12.2024
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN
C.R.P(MD)No.3065 of 2024 and C.M.P(MD)No.17440 of 2024
Manimuthu
... Petitioner / Plaintiff
Vs
1.Ayyammal 2.Palaniyammal
... Respondents /Defendants
Prayer : This Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, to direct the learned District Munsif Court, Bodinayakanur, to expeditiously dispose the E.P.No.3 of 2023 in O.S.No. 97 of 2010 within a stipulated time frame as may be framed by this Court.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the execution petition pending for a long period should be disposed of expeditiously by the executing court?
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Manimuthu
- respondent
Ayyammal
- respondent
Palaniyammal
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court