Dismissed

Jeyapandi v. Liyakath Ali Khan

Madras HC26 Nov 2024CRP(MD)/247/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Madras High Court dismissed a Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution. The petition sought a direction to number an unnumbered Interlocutory Application filed under Order 9 Rule 7 CPC to set aside an ex parte decree. The court found the petition infructuous as the judgment in the underlying suit had already been delivered.

What did the court decide?

The Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

Jeyapandi Vs Liyakath Ali Khan — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Madras HC (2024)

¶1

CRP(MD)No.247 of 2020

¶2

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

¶3

DATED : 26.11.2024

¶4

CORAM:

¶5

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SENTHILKUMAR

¶6

CRP(MD)No.247 of 2020 and CMP(MD)No.1521 of 2020

¶7

1.Jeyapandi 2.Sundarapandian ... Petitioners/Petitioners/Defendants 2 and 7

¶8

¶9

1.Liyakath Ali Khan ... 1^st Respondent/1^st Respondent/Plaintiff

¶10

Soundararajan (Died)

¶11

2.Mohammed Haniba Saibu

¶12

3.Velchamy

¶13

4.Kandasamy

¶14

Seeni Nayakar (Died)

¶15

5.M/s.K.V.Thermal Power Pvt. Ltd., Having its Registered Office at Block C Ground Floor, Steemwood Apartment, 14 Factory Road, Adjacent to Safdarjung Hospital New-Delhi-Represented by its authorised signatory Mr C H Ramakrishna

¶16

... 2 to 5 Respondents/2 to 7 Respondents/Defendants 3, 4, 5 & 8

¶17

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ___________ Page 1 of 4_

¶18

CRP(MD)No.247 of 2020

¶19

Prayer:

¶20

This Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to direct the learned Additional District Court, Thoothukudi to number the unnumbered I.A.No. Of 2020 in O.S.No.214 of 2016 in respect of the petition filed under Order 9 Rule 7 of CPC to set the ex parte decree.

¶21

For Petitioners : Mr.C.Jeganathan

¶22

For Respondents : Mr.V.Angusamy for R1 No Appearance for R5

¶23

ORDER

¶24

The Civil Revision Petition is filed to direct the learned Additional District Court, Thoothukudi to number the unnumbered I.A.No. Of 2020 in O.S.No.214 of 2016 in respect of the petition filed under Order 9 Rule 7 of CPC to set the ex

¶25

parte decree.

¶26

2.When the matter came up for hearing today, the learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the Judgment was delivered in O.S.No.214 of 2016 on 10.06.2020 itself. Hence, the prayer in this petition has become infructuous.

¶27

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ___________ Page 2 of 4_

¶28

CRP(MD)No.247 of 2020

¶29

3.In view of the same, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as

¶30

infrcutous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

¶31

26.11.2024 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No sji To

¶32

The Additional District Court, Thoothukudi.

¶33

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ___________ Page 3 of 4_

¶34

CRP(MD)No.247 of 2020

¶35

N.SENTHILKUMAR, J.

¶36

sji

¶37

CRP(MD)No.247 of 2020

¶38

26.11.2024

¶39

https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis ___________ Page 4 of 4_

Jeyapandi v. Liyakath Ali Khan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jeyapandi v. Liyakath Ali Khan

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Subbaiah Vs Mariammal

M.Muthukumar, Vs Balakrishnan

R.Balasundari Vs Chandrababu

Andavar, Vs Balaji Vemnkatesh

V.Sarojini Vs R.Rani

Rathinasamy Vs Packiadurai