The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court dismissed a Civil Revision Petition challenging an interim order of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, holding it non-maintainable due to the absence of a statutory remedy under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019. Liberty was granted to approach the appropriate forum.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRP(MD).No.2442 of 2024
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 03.12.2024
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS JUSTICE K. GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI
C.R.P(MD)No.2442 of 2024 and CMP(MD).No.13716 of 2024
A.Joseph Rathinam
: Petitioner / respondent
Vs.
S.Pankajam rep. by power of attorney V. Bala Ganesh
: Respondent / Complainant
PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the interim order dated 29.08.2024 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Tiruchirappalli in CMP.No.251 of 2023 in CC.No.102 of 2022.
For Petitioner : Mr.T. Leninkumar For respondent : Mr.B. Prasanna Vinoth
ORDER
This Civil Revision Petition has been filed to set aside the interim
order, dated 29.08.2024 made in CMP.No.251 of 2023 in CC.No.102 of
2022 on the file of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission,
CRP(MD).No.2442 of 2024
Tiruchirappalli
03.12.2024
Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes/ No trp
CRP(MD).No.2442 of 2024
Note:
To
The District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Tiruchirappalli
CRP(MD).No.2442 of 2024
K. GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI, J.,
trp
C.R.P(MD)No.2442 of 2024 and CMP(MD).No.13716 of 2024
03.12.2024
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a Civil Revision Petition is maintainable under Article 227 against an interim order of the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission when no statutory remedy is available under the Cons
2 provisions across 2 enactments
A.Joseph Rathinam
S.Pankajam
K. GOVINDARAJAN THILAKAVADI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
