Nagarani, v. Krishnakumar
Case brief
What is this about?
Held that the judicial magistrate, Palani must dispose of the pending complaint in D.V.C.No.16 of 2023 within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, citing excessive pendency.
What did the court decide?
Direction to the judicial magistrate, Palani, to dispose of the case within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
What the court decided
C.R.P(MD)No.194 of 2024
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 14.02.2024
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN
C.R.P(MD)No.194 of 2024
Nagarani
... Petitioner
Vs
1.Krishnakumar 2.Rajendran 3.Vijayakumar 4.Oviya 5.Sasikala
... Respondents
Prayer : Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to direct the Judicial Magistrate, Palani, to dispose of the complaint in D.V.C.No.16 of 2023 within a time frame as fixed by this Court.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the judicial magistrate must dispose of the pending complaint within a fixed timeline under Article 226.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Nagarani
- respondent
Krishnakumar
- respondent
Rajendran
- respondent
Vijayakumar
- respondent
Oviya
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court