Common order permitting withdrawal of three Civil Revision Petitions and a connected miscellaneous petition filed under Article 226, followed by dismissal as withdrawn and closure of the competent petition.
Permission granted to withdraw the Civil Revision Petitions; petitions dismissed as withdrawn; connected miscellaneous petition closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
C.R.P.(PD)(MD)Nos.180 to 182 of 2020
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 23.02.2024
CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR
C.R.P.(PD)(MD)Nos.180 to 182 of 2020 and C.M.P.(MD)No.1055 of 2020
1.I.Chelladurai
2.I.Lingadurai
... Petitioners in
all C.R.Ps.
Vs.
Irulaiyammal (Died)
1.Murugesan
... Respondents in
all C.R.Ps.
Page 1 of 4
C.R.P.(PD)(MD)Nos.180 to 182 of 2020
COMMON PRAYER : Petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to set aside the Order in I.A.Nos.400 to 402 of 2017 in O.S.No. 274 of 2008 on the file of the District Munsif, at Arruppukottai, dated 21.03.2019.
For Petitioners : Mr.J.Jeyakumaran (In all Cases) For Respondents : M/s.Vijayakumari Natarajan (In all Cases)
COMMON ORDER
The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seek permission of this Court to withdraw these Civil Revision Petitions.
withdrawn. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
23.02.2024 Neutral Citation: Yes / No Index : Yes / No vsm
Page 2 of 4
C.R.P.(PD)(MD)Nos.180 to 182 of 2020
To
Page 3 of 4
C.R.P.(PD)(MD)Nos.180 to 182 of 2020
MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR, J.
vsm
C.R.P.(PD)(MD)Nos.180 to 182 of 2020
23.02.2024
_____________ Page 4 of 4_
I. Chelladurai
I. Lingadurai
Irulaiyammal
1. Murugesan
2. Nadarajan
3. Saraswathi
MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
