George David, v. Jenshilal
Case brief
What is this about?
In this civil revision under Article 226, the Madras High Court directed the Additional District Judge, Srivilliputhur, to dispose of interlocutory applications regarding maintenance within two months.
What did the court decide?
Directed the Additional District Judge, Srivilliputhur to dispose of the interlocutory applications within two months.
What the court decided
C.R.P.(MD)No.164 of 2024
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED: 26.03.2024
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN
C.R.P.(MD)No.164 of 2024
George David ... Petitioner/Petitioner
Vs.
Jenshilal
... Respondent/Respondent
PRAYER : Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to pass an order directing the learned Additional District Judge, Srivilliputhur, to dispose of the petition in I.D.O.P.No. 165 of 2021 pending on the file of the learned Additional District Judge, Srivilliputhur as expeditiously as possible.
For Petitioner : Mr.C.Joseph Sathianeson For Respondent : Mr.N.Dilipkumar
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to direct the trial court to dispose of pending interlocutory applications in the divorce proceedings expeditiously.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
George David
- respondent
Jenshilal
Coram
G.ILANGOVAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court