Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 226 to strike off a plaint was dismissed as infructuous because the underlying application in the connected trial court had already been rejected by the trial court on 03.02.2024.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
CRP(MD).No.125 of 2024
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT
DATED : 20.02.2024
CORAM :
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN
CRP(MD).No. 125 of 2024 and CMP(MD).No.559 of 2024
D.Thangaraj Pandian Petitioner
Vs.
1.T.S.M.Sampath Kumar
2.D.Ganapathy 3.G.Sharmila Respondents
PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India to strike off the plaint in I.A.No.1 of 2024 in O.S.No.72 of 2023 on the file of the Additional District Judge, Paramakudi, Ramanathapuram District.
For Petitioner : Mr.Balamurali Krishnan For respondent : No appearance
ORDER
Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned
counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that I.A.No.1 of 2024 in
1/3
CRP(MD).No.125 of 2024
O.S.No.72 of 2023 was rejected by the trial Court, by order dated 03.02.2024 and hence, the matter has become infructuous.
20 .02.2024
Internet : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Speaking / Non Speaking order trp
To
The Additional District Judge, Paramakudi, Ramanathapuram District.
2/3
CRP(MD).No.125 of 2024
G.ILANGOVAN,J.
Trp
CRP(MD).No. 125 of 2024 and CMP(MD).No.559 of 2024
20.02.2024
3/3
D. Thangaraj Pandian
T.S.M. Sampath Kumar
D. Ganapathy
G. Sharmila
G. ILANGOVAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
